Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Government

Submission + - Will Cars Eventually Need a Do-Not-Track Option? (slashdot.org)

Nerval's Lobster writes: "Earlier this month, a very public argument erupted between Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk and New York Times reporter John Broder, who claimed in a Feb. 8 column that his electric-powered Model S sedan had ground to a halt on a lonely stretch of Connecticut highway, starved for power. Musk retaliated by publishing the data from Broder's test drive, which suggested the reporter had driven the vehicle at faster speeds than he had claimed in the article (which would have drained the battery at a quicker rate) and failed to fully charge the car at available stations. Musk seems to have let the whole thing drop, but the whole brouhaha raises a point that perhaps deserves further exploration: the rising use of sensors in cars, and whether an automobile company—or any other entity, for that matter—has the right to take data from those sensors and use it for their own ends without the owner's permission. (For his part, Musk has claimed that Tesla only turns on data logging with “explicit written permission from customers.”) What do you think, Slashdot? Do we need the equivalent of a "Do Not Track" option for cars?"
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Will Cars Eventually Need a Do-Not-Track Option?

Comments Filter:

Is it possible that software is not like anything else, that it is meant to be discarded: that the whole point is to always see it as a soap bubble?

Working...