How cross-platform is Swift ? Are the GUI libraries platform-dependent or independent ? I.E: can i write a single Swift program with a GUI that will compile, work the same and look similar on multiple platforms: Linux, Mac OS, Real Unix-es & BSDs, AIX, Windows ?
Chris Lattner has a wife, I am pretty sure he does not want to fuck you. But if the features are so compelling that you want to have sex with him, they can't be all that bad, no?
Also, ruby, Java, Python and, em, pretty much no other language have direct C++ interop. C, sure. C++, not often.
Chris Lattner has a wife, I am pretty sure he does not want to fuck you. But if the features are so compelling that you want to have sex with him, they can't be all that bad, no?
Also, ruby, Java, Python and, em, pretty much no other language have direct C++ interop. C, sure. C++, not often.
That's because C++ is an absolute JOKE of a "Language". Created SPECIFICALLY to be hopelessly complex and wasteful.
Seriously. It's the worst of the worst, and considering the other horrible languages it has to "compete" with, that's saying something.
Cross-platform (Score:5)
How cross-platform is Swift ?
Are the GUI libraries platform-dependent or independent ?
I.E: can i write a single Swift program with a GUI that will compile, work the same and look similar on multiple platforms: Linux, Mac OS, Real Unix-es & BSDs, AIX, Windows ?
Re: (Score:1)
None of Apple's GUI libraries are open source or cross platform and they never will be.
Re: Cross-platform (Score:0)
Swift is stupid and ugly, that's why. And I'm talking about their language.
No direct C++ interop, stupid confusing optionals, never ending spec updates and deprecation... Fuck you Chris Lattner
Re: (Score:2)
If you find optionals confusing, I suggest you do something different to programming.
Re: (Score:2)
Chris Lattner has a wife, I am pretty sure he does not want to fuck you. But if the features are so compelling that you want to have sex with him, they can't be all that bad, no?
Also, ruby, Java, Python and, em, pretty much no other language have direct C++ interop. C, sure. C++, not often.
Re: (Score:2)
Chris Lattner has a wife, I am pretty sure he does not want to fuck you. But if the features are so compelling that you want to have sex with him, they can't be all that bad, no?
Also, ruby, Java, Python and, em, pretty much no other language have direct C++ interop. C, sure. C++, not often.
That's because C++ is an absolute JOKE of a "Language". Created SPECIFICALLY to be hopelessly complex and wasteful.
Seriously. It's the worst of the worst, and considering the other horrible languages it has to "compete" with, that's saying something.
Re: (Score:2)
Swift is stupid and ugly, that's why. And I'm talking about their language.
No direct C++ interop, stupid confusing optionals, never ending spec updates and deprecation... Fuck you Chris Lattner
Again, Slashdotters show their debate skills...
Re: (Score:3)