C# is well-established, and Microsoft has shown that it's very willing to adapt C# as necessary to support new techniques. I wouldn't be surprised at all if C# inherited good ideas from Swift.
I'm more interested in what Chris has to say about Rust, another much-newer language that's much closer in age to Swift, but also different from established languages like C#, C++ and Java.
Chris, what are your general thoughts about Rust as a programming language?
Seeing as it fits somewhere between languages like C++ a
There's a double problem with Codes of Conduct: 1) is the fact that it seems we NEED them. Most software devs are well-adjusted, normal people, but there's always that asshole who has to be 'edgy' or whatever and ends up fucking it up for everyone. Kinda like laws. We read these ridiculous laws and wonder 'why the fuck is that a law, no one would be that fucking stupid/asshole' and then you dig in and find out that, yes, someone(s) was that fucking stupid and now we all have to pay for that person's asshole
by Anonymous Coward writes:
on Tuesday January 10, 2017 @04:45PM (#53644039)
well-adjusted, normal people,
You misspelled "cock-sucking socialite."
Codes of Conduct are blatant attempts to eliminate the old-school autistic nerds who created technology which social people now seek to usurp for their own benefit.
C# (Score:5, Interesting)
What do you think about Microsoft and C# versus the merits of Swift?
What are Rust's prospects like? (Score:3, Interesting)
C# is well-established, and Microsoft has shown that it's very willing to adapt C# as necessary to support new techniques. I wouldn't be surprised at all if C# inherited good ideas from Swift.
I'm more interested in what Chris has to say about Rust, another much-newer language that's much closer in age to Swift, but also different from established languages like C#, C++ and Java.
Chris, what are your general thoughts about Rust as a programming language?
Seeing as it fits somewhere between languages like C++ a
Re: (Score:0)
There's a double problem with Codes of Conduct:
1) is the fact that it seems we NEED them. Most software devs are well-adjusted, normal people, but there's always that asshole who has to be 'edgy' or whatever and ends up fucking it up for everyone. Kinda like laws. We read these ridiculous laws and wonder 'why the fuck is that a law, no one would be that fucking stupid/asshole' and then you dig in and find out that, yes, someone(s) was that fucking stupid and now we all have to pay for that person's asshole
Re:What are Rust's prospects like? (Score:-1)
well-adjusted, normal people,
You misspelled "cock-sucking socialite."
Codes of Conduct are blatant attempts to eliminate the old-school autistic nerds who created technology which social people now seek to usurp for their own benefit.
Re: (Score:0)
> Codes of Conduct are blatant attempts to eliminate the old-school autistic nerds who created technology
Like you, I presume?