And paper is still secure. The US just had the most secure and vetted election in the history of elections ever, and most of that was done by paper. The only reason - the only reason - to try to switch to any kind of electronic voting, no matter how supposedly 'secure', is to try and rig the election. If there is no paper trail, there was no valid vote - and if there is a paper trail, why not just use paper to begin with?
There has to be a paper trail all the way. a blockchain could ensure something called nonrefutability so that there is proof of the votes, in the order they came in. you could also hash the private information so that the voting party can verify their vote was counted correctly. corrections would be auditable.
Because it's not necessary. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: Because it's not necessary. (Score:1)
Re: Because it's not necessary. (Score:1)