Memory Leaks 34
G3ck0G33k writes: "Is there any free software version/clone of Rational's programs PureCoverage and/or Purify? I have worked with both of them on fairly large projects (>150,000 lines of code) and they were great to work with. When the first runs of Purify found nearly fifty instances of minor memory leaks, I was deeply frustrated/impressed. A free (perhaps GPLd) clone would be so interesting; Rational's licensing is killing my current budget. Of course, the more kinds of leaks it may detect, the better. GeckoGeek" We had a similar question last year but there's no harm in seeing what the current answers are.
Bounded pointers, etc. (Score:5, Informative)
Bad news: You'll have to build your own gcc (Greg's changes haven't yet been accepted in to the gcc trunk), and all your libraries (just as Purify re-writes all your libraries).
Good news: The resulting code is much faster than Purify'ed code, and finds some problems Purify doesn't. I know of a major software development effort (hundreds of developers, millions of lines of code; sorry, can't give details) that uses bounded pointers to great advantage.
Other tools: GNU Checker, dbmalloc, Bruce Perens' Electric Fence, MemProf, mpatrol, and Mprof; Google searches will turn them all up.
Memory leak detection (Score:5, Informative)
The Boehm-Weiser garbage-collecting malloc() can be built in a leak-detection mode. Every time an object is leaked, it prints out the address of the memory in question. Do that. Then it's 15 lines of python to correlate that back with the malloc() calls; I wrapped malloc/realloc to print out the line number and filename, e.g.
void *our_malloc(size_t howbig, int line, char * file)
{
void *p;
p=GC_malloc(howbig);
fprintf(stderr, "Line %d of %s/%s(): %p\n", line, file, p);
return p;
}
#define malloc(x) our_malloc(x, __LINE__, __FILE__)
with similar for realloc (and make free do GC_free).
Then run the proggy, redirecting stderr through a simple python script: (leading spaces have been replaced with underscores since slashdot doesn't do PRE)
import sys
a={}
for line in sys.stdin.readlines():
__line=line.strip()
__num=line[line.find("0x"):]
__try:
____num=num[0: num.index(" ")]
__except:
____pass
__if line[1]=="i":
____a[num]=line
__else:
____print "Leaked object: "+a[num]
When I run my program this way I get the following output:
Leaked object: Line 43 of leak_stuff.c/(): 0x806efe0
Leaked object: Line 43 of leak_stuff.c/(): 0x806eff0
Leaked object: Line 55 of leak_stuff.c/(): 0x806dfd8
Which tells me which lines to look for the initial allocations of leaked objects at.
The garbage-collecting malloc is really cool; it's at:
http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc/
for now, but rumor has it that gcc will become the official source for it at some point (it's needed for the Java compiler).
Sumner
ccmalloc (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Memory leak detection (Score:3, Informative)
C compilers may not hide pointers in the generated object code. In our experience, standard commercial compilers obey this restriction in unoptimized code. Most aggressive optimizing compilers do not obey this restriction for all optimized code. For details and examples see papers/pldi96.ps.gz. However, it is difficult to construct examples for which they violate it, especially for single-threaded code. In our experience, the only examples we have found of a failure with the current collector, even in multi-threaded code, were contrived.
However, the gcc developers claim the gcc does in fact violate this constraint. So using Boehm gc with gcc may not be safe in production code. The gcc mailing list has had a couple of threads on how to make gcc garbage-collector friendly in the future (once again, Java is one impetus for this). Until then, I'd stick to manual mm and use the gc only to help find leaks.
Sumner
Here's a quick and easy solution (Score:2, Informative)
dmalloc for memory debugging (Score:3, Informative)
I like dmalloc [dmalloc.com] for memory debugging. It even found a memory bug for a program that purify choked on. It doesn't have a GUI.
Re:I asked REdhat once.. (Score:2, Informative)
MEMPROF (Score:3, Informative)
Its not purify (it really aims for leak detection, not all the other errors purify finds), but the efence + memprof combination gets you about 85% of purify's functionality.
It seems to handle threaded apps reasonably well, and C++ doesn't faze it. The only down side is that its hard to get running on non-x86 platforms.
Checker (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Memory leak detection (Score:4, Informative)
license.
Compiles and runs out of the box on an alpha
running Linux.
GUI? uh no. It has a nifty command line utility to control logging etc...
mpatrol (Score:2, Informative)
It can:
- log your memory usage
- report on improper memory usage
- profile your memory usage
- work with your applications *without* re-linking (assuming your OS allows this)
The web page is at:
http://www.cbmamiga.demon.co.uk/mpatrol/
In addition, the author has excellent documentation. The pdf manual actually has a section that lists competing products and what they do.
http://www.cbmamiga.demon.co.uk/mpatrol/files/m