OpenSource Alternative to TheBrain? 25
m1cajah asks: "Been scouring the Net for an open-source alternative to The Brain. Specifically, I'm interested in a web version to use for creating a small intranet/portal site at my company. Does one exist out there? I've looked at some of the mind-mapping stuff out there and what's available just isn't as elegant, easy to use, or intuitive as TheBrain. TheBrain has a web-version called "SiteBrain" but it's cost is WAY too high for our little company (only 15 of us) and requires far too much "consultation" to make it work. Does anyone know of a nice alternative?"
Does anyone know of a nice alternative? (Score:-1, Offtopic)
YAY. I finally won. I feel so pointless and childish.
Or is the company called "TheBrainless"? (Score:4, Interesting)
Did you ever notice that one company is taking over the Internet? The company is called "Click here to get the plugin."
Okay, okay, maybe it's because I don't like this:
By editing the Flash header (SWF), it is possible to run any code on the computer of a visitor to a web page, according to an eEye Digital Security Alert [eeye.com]. The vulnerability exists in all versions of Flash and in all browsers that support Flash, making it "... trivial to bypass firewalls and attack the user at his desktop." eEye reported a previous vulnerability [eeye.com] last May.
I've always disliked how Flash tends to be an advertisement for Flash. Visitors to a page with Flash often get upgrade notices.
TheBrainLess could realize that a lot of people deleted the Flash plugin during one of the previous security alerts.
Nice idea (Score:1)
A couple of alternatives (Score:2, Informative)
One interesting one is TouchGraph [touchgraph.com], best known for the google set vista [langreiter.com].
Plumb Design [plumbdesign.com] also has the Visual Thesaurus [plumbdesign.com], which is cool looking even if it's not really practical.
Re:A couple of alternatives (Score:1)
Slightly OT (Score:1)
For Palm? (Score:2)
use a Wiki... (Score:4, Informative)
That is my recommendation. www.openwiki.com
Re:use a Wiki... yeah! (Score:4, Informative)
That said, they can also be very chaotic. If you aren't careful with how you organize your pages, they can become unwieldy. Of course, so can using the Brain. Fortunately, reorganizing a wiki structure is easy (if time consuming).
That said, if IIS & ASP don't work for you, look into other flavors of wikis. For example:
Lots of choices!
Re:use a Wiki (and/or other software)... yeah! (Score:2, Informative)
There's also the book, The Wiki Way [c2.com].
You could probably build something on top of Zope [zope.org] (which comes with a ZWiki [slashdot.org] component), and might find a href="http://www.gzigzag.org/
Proper wiki etc. info (public embarrassment) (Score:2, Informative)
Please ignore the last paragraph of my last comment.
. o O ( Preview button...oh, yeah! )
You could probably build something on top of Zope [zope.org] (which comes with a ZWiki [zwiki.org] component), and might find gZigZag [gzigzag.org] interesting.
Tinderbox [eastgate.com], and Userland [userland.com]'s products, though not open/free, are two other platforms to build on or learn from.
Re:use a Wiki... yeah! (Score:1, Informative)
It's probably one of the more feature complete ones out there, and essentially comes with it's own development environment, the Smalltalk system that runs it...
You can use the swiki tools themselves, or the Squeak Server Pages extension too.
It's a breeze to set up and run, and it's easy to maintain.
Swiki.net [swiki.net] is a website offering free swiki hosts using Squeak Swiki as the back end.
Yes, it's been done (Score:3, Informative)
TheBrain UI is patented (Score:3, Informative)
Re:TheBrain UI is patented (Score:0)
Hate to be a luddite... (Score:3, Insightful)
I've dealt with this concept a few times (both as a full-time employee and, more frequently, since I became a consultant), and every time someone comes to me with a Mind Map, it takes an absurd amount of time to straighten out what they actually want, and how to implement it. I'm sure that the method is great for brain storming, or getting stoned and coming up with ideas, or whatever, but it simply sucks as a substitute for coming up with a plan of action.
Every time I've encountered this sort of behaviour out of people, I end up first sitting in endless meetings determining what people actually care about, then turning it into a prioritised outline, and finally coming up with a plan that roughly fits what they started with. All at a rather serious cost to clients, now that I'm working for myself. (I'd like to say that that's fine because I'm making money doing it, but I hate the process of reverse engineering a client's crappy notes. If they'd just plan correctly in the first place, they'd be richer, and I'd have more hair.)
Do yourself a favor. Instead of a Mind Map, start thinking about what you want to say/do, what is most important, and if you have to draw, use a real graphical business system modeller, like Visio or Kivio. (I must say I hate Kivio. Visio sort of sucks, but Kivio sucks more. Sure, flame me.) If you're more technical than I'm giving you credit for, forgive me first, and then whip out a note book, and start combining scribbles with words. That's my personal dirty secret - I have a business diary (coming on, I think 18 volumes shortly) that I take endless notes in and - yes! - draw in. I use that to model proposals that I send to clients. Those proposals are almost always in words, but occasionally I do draw a diagram, but only after I have the full gameplan and the processes to support it in my head.*
That's the difference, I think. One doesn't submit one's class notes to a professor, and one doesn't submit Mind Maps to people who actually have to implement things.Sure, I'm sure this software can turn your mental process into a web page. Please point me to a site developed that way (besides the parent corp.) which is relevant on a frequent basis to others.
Don't mean to be harsh, but I've hard learned lessons that this is not a model to push for efficient business practice.
-j
* For the zealots out there, I've been using almost nothing but Open Source software in my personal business for over a year. I frequently have to do something for clients with software like Oracle and a host of small providers of commercial software, but aside from the W2K box to test web interfaces with (and that's a dual boot server that also has my ripped CD collection on it), there is no commercial software in our office. I still miss Mathematica, and might end up making an exception for it. I haven't given up yet, though.And at least Mathematica runs on Linux.
Dia is a free graph prog like visio (Score:2, Informative)
http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia/
Re:Dia is a free graph prog like visio (Score:1)
-j
Comment removed (Score:1)
Re:Hate to be a luddite... (Score:2, Insightful)
I've been looking at something like this myself. I am writing a PhD dissertation and I need a place to keep my notes, link them to related notes, organize them and be able to do a text search easily. While I know that when it comes to the actual writing, I will have to sort them out and give them full coherence, it would not make sense to follow the same process for research notes: a note can fall under more than one category and be related to multiple issues/other notes, so a full hierarchical and linear distribution would not help. Sometimes it pays off to break away from this mode of thinking, not all bits of knowledge are related like a well-planned report or book, even when you have to get them into that shape later.
Now, for something that may actually be useful to the person who made the question, I found two possibilities: OpenReference [sourceforge.net], but I never could make that one work on my computer; currently, I am looking at Pile [codewhore.org], which looks interesting, I got it working in my machine, but I have not had enough time for a close look.
Take a look at topic maps (Score:1)
An alternative to the brain. (Score:0)
Welcome to the ass. (Score:0)
ones I found (Score:1)
Please vote "no" on the Bush administration's war (Score:0)
Dear [Your legisator's name will be inserted]:
I am writing to ask you to reject President Bush's request for
authorization of preemptive military action against Iraq. Please vote
"no" on the Bush administration's war resolution.
Iraq is a real problem. It must comply with all relevant United
Nations (UN) resolutions and allow unfettered inspections to determine
whether it has eliminated its nuclear, biological, and chemical
weapons programs. However, the way in which the United States
addresses the situation in Iraq will have far-reaching effects on the
future prospects for effective controls on these weapons. Unilateral
and preemptive military actions by the United States against Iraq
would undermine the authority of the UN in addressing future threats
to international security and make controlling weapons of mass
destruction more difficult in the longer run.
Effective controls will require a strong international regime, one
based on the rule of law, supported by the international community,
and enforced by the UN Security Council. The United States can, and
should, respond in a way that will address the near-term problem of
Iraq's programs to develop weapons of mass destruction, and also lay
the groundwork for a more secure and stable international order on
which US security will ultimately depend.
The United States should now work to gain UN Security Council approval
for the immediate resumption of inspections with no conditions and, if
effective inspections do not proceed, for efforts to enforce Iraqi
disarmament. The use of armed force against Iraq should be considered
only as a last resort and should be authorized by the UN Security
Council. Please vote no on any resolution that does not impose these
conditions on US military actions.
Sincerely,
[your name will appear here]
*******
Thank you for taking action.