Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Wireless Networking Hardware

Hybrid Community Networks? 23

Posted by Cliff from the more-community-wiring-technologies dept.
CaryMenage asks: "I live in Philadelphia where there is a chock full of row houses and MDU (Multiple Dwelling Units) buildings. I was wondering if other Slashdot readers have been involved with community networks and what methods they have used. I have been looking at several different ways to distribute a T1 circuit to multiple end users; WiFi, Powerline, HomePNA. Due to the physical and legal complexities of older buildings and crossing public streets, I feel that some type of hybrid mixture of different topologies would work well in many situations. Has anyone implemented any of this on a large scale installation?"
"I currently let my neighbor access the Internet through a powerline device that works well through the power meters. It seems to me that in theory, one could repeat the Ethernet with a cheap switch and send it to the next neighbor with another pair of powerline devices. Then when you have to cross a public street one could use a pair of Wireless Access Points in bridge mode. I also found a "leaky coax" product called RADIAX that I was wondering if anyone has applied this to 802.11. Seems to me you could use this coax and amplifiers to expand wireless coverage within buildings. For apartment buildings with somewhat organized main phone closets I have been looking at HomePNA products like the Xterasys HSM-1402 14-port HomePNA Switch and the Xterasys VX-110B for the end users connection."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Hybrid Community Networks? More

Hybrid Community Networks?

Comments Filter:

  • Limited physical change (Score:3, Interesting)

    by jtev ( 133871 ) on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @10:45PM (#9628528) Journal
    If there are restrictions on what you can do with wiring, wi-fi is probably a good idea, as long as you use encryption, such as WEP. if you can lay wire, ethernet would be the way to go, at least for a single building dwelling. having a WAP may be a good idea anyway, even if you can lay wire for those who want it, but it realy depends on your situation.

    • wireless routing (Score:3, Interesting)

      by j1m+5n0w ( 749199 )

      For a large wireless network, you'll probably want a robust ad-hoc routing protocol [wikipedia.org] like aodv or dsr. Most cheap wireless access points don't support that sort of thing, though. Take a look at roofnet [mit.edu] if you want to see what's possible. This is still an active area of research, though. Any success stories out there about large wireless ad-hoc networks?

      -jim

    • Unfortunately WEP is broken and easily cracked. This guy told me how to crack WEP [hrp.com].
    • WEP isnt too useful for security, even for point-to-point links.

      For something thats more or less a perm network structure, generally one way to do it is with older cheap boxes (IE p133's) that you can get say 4 of. (Two sets of two, one for each side of the bridge, and redundancy)
      Throw in a wireless card, hookup your directional antennas, and run without WAP but use IPSEC over the two. Even simplier (But not as flexible or secure, the later of which is all that may be importaint here) is another simpler e

  • Why? (Score:2)

    by bconway ( 63464 ) *
    Why would you want to distribute a T1 circuit to multiple end users? Cable is 3Mbps/256Kbps to each user, given a large enough pipe feeding it all, and is extremely cheap.
    • because if your T1 goes down, you call up the phone company and they fix it, and most of them come with an SLA. Cable modems don't get such priority service. If your cable goes out, good luck.

      T1 also uploads much faster, which will be a factor if you have a few gamers or a few people that VPN all the time, or both.

      T1 also usually comes with static ip addresses which would be handy if you have users that want to run dedicated servers, like a website for the apartment building. Sure you can host on cable mo
      • The SLA would be the main reason, but also the fact that Comcrap would not appreciate me competing with them for broadband customers, especially when they would be providing the uplink. An idea for my neighborhood would be to get multiple T1 circuits as the end users grow, that way even when one T1 goes down, one could point to another for their gateway.

        • Re:Why? (Score:2)

          by akb ( 39826 )
          I suggest you get two adsl lines from seperate providers and, to get near to that SLA performance, use a router like the one from Xincom that supports load balancing and failover. Covad's adsl 6mbps/768kbps product is $77/month from Nextwave, I'll let you do the math as to how much that blows a T1 out of the water.
      • If my cable goes out, so does half the town, and it gets fixed immediately. I'd also rather not have some asswipe kid down the street sucking up all of my upload bandwidth with his piracy, unless you're suggesting fractioning off a T1's bandwidth to each customer, which makes the situation even WORSE.
  • In the Columbia gorge, the big high-speed internet provider uses a wireless solution. I don't know if directional microwave is acceptable, but they might be worth looking at:

    www.gorge.net

  • Fiber? (Score:4, Informative)

    by j1m+5n0w ( 749199 ) on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @11:26PM (#9628803) Homepage Journal

    Fiber optic networking is great technology, and its not that expensive to get old fiber optic ethernet to coper ethernet media converters (typically ~$150 for 100mbps multimode, ~$200 for 100mbps singlemode). On ebay such equipment is much cheaper, especially if you go with old 10mbps 10baseFL media converters.

    If laying your own cable is an option, this would give you a great upgrade path. 10mbps now, 10gbps in a few years.

    The big choice is singlemode or multimode. Single mode equipment is harder to find and a little bit more expensive. The range (20-100 km for SM, 2km for MM) and theoretical information capacity (terabits per second vs gigabits) is much greater, though. I've heard that SM is harder to terminate unless you can afford a fusion splicer.

    Has anyone out there inexpensively set up a community network with fiber?

    -jim

  • Go All Wireless (Score:5, Interesting)

    by max born ( 739948 ) on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @11:41PM (#9628877)
    Don't know how much of a Linux user you are but I built a couple of wireless access points/relays for my neighbors that hook up the to the sflan network [sflan.org].

    I used a couple of old junker laptops running Linux. This should be completely scalable to your situation. Here's a link [hrp.com] to how I did it. For a relay/access point the same principle applies, just use two cards, one with a directional antenna the links to you, the other with an omnidirectional that serves DHCP. I found that cheapo cards on old hardware works great.

    There are plenty of sites that have intructions for building directional antennas. From my experience you don't need to spend a lot of money for this kind of thing.

    I'm glad your sharing your bandwidth. More people need to do this. Hopefully, one day the Internet will be entirely wireless and free. Free meaning you don't have to pay an ISP, you just buy your equipment and you're online. Just like CB radio.

    Feel free to use my email address at the above site if you have any questions.
    • Why would I go wireless to a home right next to me if a pair of cheap Powerline devices would do the same for less money and a potential throughput of 14Mps? I would go wireless to go over a public street or an un cooperative neighbor. Also the expense of weather proofing WAPS and external antennas etc...
      • You're quite right for the "next door" situation, of course.

      • Re:Go All Wireless (Score:4, Interesting)

        by Oculus Habent ( 562837 ) * <oculus.habent@gm ... Nom minus author> on Wednesday July 07, 2004 @09:39AM (#9631241) Journal
        I have a couple of thoughts & questions.

        First, the questions:

        What kind of security plans do you have? Is this to be firewalled from the Internet but an open LAN behind the firewall? Will each building/unit have a firewall?

        How large an area are you looking at servicing? One street (both sides)? Two? A city block?

        Are you setting up your own servers/services: Web hosting, e-mail, etc? Will everyone receive a live IP, or will it be private?

        Next, some thoughts.

        I would suggest firewalls. Sure, it's a pain - and an expense - to install at every unit, but it ensures security. If one of your users puts in an unsecured WAP, you aren't vulnerable. I would at least suggest it to each user. If they want to join the "network neighborhood", so be it. A $50 Cable/DSL Router should work splendidly, and transition to other services if a user desires.

        Wireless is great for a dozen reasons; the biggest is convenience. If you do install wireless, I would recommend that the access points are 802.11g and support wireless bridging. The extra expense means no extra cables and the ability to expand the network quickly. You might also look into using directional antennas [cantenna.com] if you just want to bridge a distance. The directional antennas give you much better range and make it slightly more difficult for others to access your network. Encryption should go without saying. You might also consider setting up separate 802.11b base stations if there are many laptop users. 11b users will slow down an 11g access point.

        For in-home wiring, it might be preferable to design a common "wiring cabinet" that you can tuck in a corner of the basement or mount on a wall. You can fabricate them identically and drop them into each house with a cheap eight-port switch, a surge protector with a swiveling plug (you have no idea how nice these are until you have one) and a little extra space for firewall/router, more switches, etc. to make installation a breeze.

        You might think about a secondary Internet connection and a dual-wan router [xincom.com] to improve speed and reliability of the connection. The expense isn't huge and additional bandwidth never killed anyone. :) The XiNCOM router handles specific routing and filtering, so as not to interfere with any servers you might be running.

  • Another Topology Method (Score:4, Interesting)

    by CaryMenage ( 783664 ) on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @11:46PM (#9628898) Homepage
    Since I didn't want to take up to many bytes, I left out an idea of taking over the coax cable from the cable company inside an apartment building (in most cases cable after the tap in a building is property of building owner) and create a cable modem network as well as an SMATV system, using cisco broadband equipment, multiple sat receivers and RF modulators, one per channel. The only problem their is the cost of the cisco equipment. So I wonder if anyone has succesfully used old cable modems, say one at a Linux box serving DHCP, DNS gateway etc.. and the end users with standard DOCSIS cable modems? Fiber is still to expensive to install.

  • Cat5 all the way baby. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by psergiu ( 67614 ) on Wednesday July 07, 2004 @05:06AM (#9629977)
    5 & 8 port switches are cheap. Shielded cat5 is cheap. Unshielded cat5 (for runs 70m inside buildings) is even cheaper. For jumps between buildings use some steel wire (the kind used for drying clothes is the best), secure-it and then wrap the cat5 around it. Ensure that the switches won't be rained on and that the power can't be disconnected accidentaly. If you have jumps between buildings larger than 10m use ProtectNet (or other eclators). If you want redundancy use switches that support spanning tree and create network loops. Is 100baseT, is cheap and it works.
    See http://www.era.ro/ for an example.
    There are almost 100 networks like this here in Bucharest.

  • Optical Air Link (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Maljin Jolt ( 746064 ) on Wednesday July 07, 2004 @05:39PM (#9636225) Journal
    For many community nodes, CZFree network in Prague (and other czech cities) uses an optical light, but no laser(!) device called Ronja. Garage design by professionals, becomes a marketable technology after several years of experiments. Range of the two way direct visibility link is measured in kilometers, band is about 10M.

    Here some links:

    Home page [twibright.com]
    Some 64 existing deployments of the device [twibright.com]
    An example of installation in dense city area [twibright.com]

Slashdot Top Deals

Solutions are obvious if one only has the optical power to observe them over the horizon. -- K.A. Arsdall

Close