Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?
GUI Software Printer

One Year Later - CUPS Admin Still Lacking? 447

DopeyDad asks: "OK, it was close to a year ago (Eric's site says July 2004, but I'd swear the original rant came earlier last year) that Eric Raymond's tirade on the unfriendly status of configuring the CUPS printing system on Linux was published. Well, I've been struggling with setting up a new laptop and getting it to talk to my print server, using Fedora Core 3, and nothing seems to have changed -- the admin items for adding a printer are exactly as Eric described them back then -- unclear, confusing, and no where near as friendly as their Win* equivalents. Definitely not something I'd expect my Aunt Ethel to be able to figure out. What's going on here? Granted, FC3 is ready to be replaced, but I don't see any CUPS updates for it. Is work being done with CUPS to address Eric's original complaints, or has this issue fallen off the radar?" For those who are still frustrated with the CUPS GUI, how would you improve it?
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

One Year Later - CUPS Admin Still Lacking?

Comments Filter:
  • Answer (Score:5, Insightful)

    by daveschroeder ( 516195 ) * on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:18PM (#12304411)
    For those who are still frustrated with the CUPS GUI, how would you improve it?

    By using Mac OS X's interface to CUPS. []


    • Re:Answer (Score:5, Insightful)

      by MrAnnoyanceToYou ( 654053 ) <> on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:29PM (#12304550) Homepage Journal
      Heh. Does this look like a prettier version of MS's printer admin stuff to anyone else?

      The thing that's missing is seamless functionality and implementation, as usual. Coding cool stuff and coding pretty, highly portable stuff are two different things, and it's hard to get people to do one for free.
    • Re:Answer (Score:5, Interesting)

      by bhsx ( 458600 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:30PM (#12304571)
      If OS X uses CUPS, can I safely assume that every OS X-compatible printer is supported by CUPS? If so, why doesn't someone just clone that interface? I mostly use my Ubuntu box for a game server these days. I haven't been using Linux as a desktop for a while (for the most part, beyond testing new games), so maybe KDE or GNOME have their own shiny interfaces that could be given a facelift to function more like the OS X version?
      • Re:Answer (Score:4, Informative)

        by topham ( 32406 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:39PM (#12304667) Homepage
        No, not every OS X Compatible printer is supported by CUPS.

        I can print to by S330 just fine from OS X. I cannot on the other hand print to it over my network. CUPS doesn't support it. (might now, haven't checked recently).

        And for some reason Windows won't print to it on my Mac, so I've been swapping the USB cable back and forth. Kinda stupid.
        • Re:Answer (Score:3, Informative)

          by w0lver ( 755034 )
          Did you try Gimp Print, it works for most USB printers. It works for my Lexamrk laser printer but not my HP inkjet, so YMMV...
        • Re:Answer (Score:4, Informative)

          by phliar ( 87116 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @04:48PM (#12306439) Homepage
          No, not every OS X Compatible printer is supported by CUPS.
          And vice versa. MacOS X doesn't support the HP LaserJet 1150 although it's supported by CUPS.

          If you dig through the CUPS documentation you learn that the 1150 is a PCL 6 printer so if you select "LaserJet 6" in the print setup tool you can print to the 1150. But Apple can't really expect Grandma (or even my non-geek lawyer friend) to figure that out.

          (I may be misremembering it being PCL 6 and LaserJet 6, it might have been 5.)

      • Re:Answer (Score:5, Informative)

        by bahamat ( 187909 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @04:34PM (#12306184) Homepage
        The reason some printers work on OS X and not on Linux is because CUPS allows running binary print filters. Remember, CUPS has nothing to do with preparing a data stream for printing. It is merely a queue manager. All it does to prepare a data stream is to hand it off to the filter program.

        Many printer manufacturers use Carbon filters for OS X. Game over.

        Now about ESR's comments, I never really saw what was so hard about it. Not that I'm claiming to be incredibly smarter than him, but the hardest part of setting up a printer using CUPS under Debian was knowing that I had to point my browser at http://localhost:631/ [localhost]. After that, what's so hard about clicking on Printers, Add Printer, then select the make and model? Seems pretty easy to me.

        Maybe ESR wasn't using the CUPS web interface, but instead using some GNOME/KDE front end. Well then that's the problem because GNOME & KDE both suck anyway. For that matter, the OS X GUI front end to CUPS isn't all that great either. Really, the only great thing about CUPS on OS X is that when you plug in your printer, it just works and doesn't need to be configured.
        • Re:Answer (Score:5, Insightful)

          by michrech ( 468134 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @04:55PM (#12306563)
          "KDE Menu" (Start Menu equivelent for Windows users)


          "Print Manager"

          Right-click -- "Add Printer/Class"

          Choose connection (from local ports to various network settings)

          Choose brand/model



          Oddly, it's *very* similar to the steps needed to set a printer up in Windows.

          What is so difficult with this?

          (All that and I didn't even mention that I use Gentoo for my distro!)


        • Re:Answer (Score:5, Informative)

          by wobblie ( 191824 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @06:20PM (#12307725)
          Remember, CUPS has nothing to do with preparing a data stream for printing. It is merely a queue manager. All it does to prepare a data stream is to hand it off to the filter program.

          This is completely incorrect. CUPS is a full featured RIP and postscript processor. It does support arbitrary binary printing, however, and this is exactly what happens when you print to cups from windows via samba. Please see the cups documentation [].

          If cups is just a "dumb spooler", explain lease how the heck it can print pdf, jpeg, hp-gl, tiff, and hundreds of other formats directly to your postscript printer?

          If you don't have a postscript printer, yes, you must use a ppd that calls a intermediary driver (e.g., hpijs) that cups just passes the job to.

        • Re:Answer (Score:3, Informative)

          by chthon ( 580889 )

          ESR's comments where not about adding a printer, but about setting up CUPS to be able to share and print on the network.

          And he was right, I had exactly the same problem as he, because the default CUPS installation restricts the usage to the local address

          You cannot change that from the web interface, you have to delve through the CUPS configuration file.

    • Whetever but this one. It is no better than fc3.

      Tell me the difference where OSX CUPS GUI is better than official fedora. The way that you define printers is practically the same. Believe me I have both OSX and fc3.

      Right way is done in printers:/// (ximian gnome or ubuntu) and in windows (if it would just stop scanning network printers, yep and that commes from me who never has anything positive to say about M$)
    • Re:Answer (Score:4, Informative)

      by Jeremiah Cornelius ( 137 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @04:52PM (#12306501) Homepage Journal
      Three little letters:
      K D E

      You want a pretty little shell [], install the thing.

  • use Mandrake (Score:5, Interesting)

    by nocomment ( 239368 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:20PM (#12304430) Homepage Journal
    Or Mandriva as it's called now. Their printer admin GUI is peaches. :-) Maybe since it's GPL'd the CUPS team can just grab it from the latest cooker?
    • Or Ubuntu (Score:4, Informative)

      by slashdevnull ( 220766 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:28PM (#12304535)
      Like everything else in Ubuntu, I had no problem configuring printers in CUPS. This is mainly because the web interface tells you to use gnome-cups-manager, and even tells you where it is in the system's menu structure. Really user friendly.
    • by TimMann ( 98520 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:55PM (#12304823) Homepage
      Mandr{ake,iva}'s printer admin thingie actually runs nmap to sniff your network and find all printers exported by all machines using any protocols it knows how to talk. It's pretty amazing, but it took 10 minutes or more to run on the building network here, during which time the GUI didn't repaint and appeared hung.

      I would have killed it in disgust, thinking it really was hung, but first I did a "top" to see if I could tell what it was doing. Then my jaw dropped when I saw it running nmap and starting and stopping many other processes to try to connect to the open ports it was finding, so I let it finish and was fairly impressed. It really needs a progress bar, or better, to have printers pop up in the GUI as they are found.
  • Reference (Score:5, Informative)

    by MrNonchalant ( 767683 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:22PM (#12304459)
    The article that is referenced is here: or.html
  • Configuring CUPS (Score:4, Informative)

    by jimpop ( 27817 ) * on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:23PM (#12304467) Homepage Journal
    forgoet the CUPS application tools, user http://localhost:631. The www interface at least works all the time.

    • What works more often than that is 'vi /etc/cups.printers.conf' :-p
    • Speak for yourself; half the time it doesn't work for me, for no good reason. When I can connect, half the time again you can't do things like remove documents from the queue. I've had bad experiences with the web interface. Of course, configuring my printer at all has always been somewhat of a pain (HP PSC-950) because it requires hpoj and a lot of setup.
  • Running FC3 on my laptop and was able to install a network printer and print to it from Firefox within minutes...I was impressed.
  • by corvair2k1 ( 658439 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:23PM (#12304472)
    Windows seems to have no problems with detecting a printer... I feel like there has to be a documented call/answer that would make the model/revision known to Windows. Could CUPS be altered to do the same thing in its installer? Could it have an online driver repository for the printer?

    Makes me wish I had time to actually work on these things, even if I find out that this can't be done. ;)
  • IIRC... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by imroy ( 755 ) <> on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:23PM (#12304473) Homepage Journal
    If I remember correctly, the problem ESR was having was with the RedHat GUI. The only "CUPS GUI" is really the web interface on port 631. Every other "real" GUI is made by some other vendor/project e.g RedHat, KDE, Gnome, etc... (OpenOffice?). I have my own complaints about the CUPS web interface, but they're nothing major. I've always just tweaked the cupsd.conf file and added the printer (s)in the web interface. No major biggy there. This all just a storm in a teacup.
    • My cups.conf is 862 lines. And there are other config files in my /etc/cups directory too. Eg clients.conf, printers.conf. Its not easy.
  • LACKING!?!? (Score:5, Funny)

    by FreeLinux ( 555387 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:23PM (#12304478)
    It's still a great big steaming pile. I never thought it would happen, but from time-to-time I catch myself saying; "Maybe I should go back to lpd" <shudder>

    One more rant, whoever it was that was unimaginative enough to come up with the foomatic name should be flogged.
  • by kosmosik ( 654958 ) <> on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:23PM (#12304481) Homepage
    It has little to do with CUPS itself. It is rather Fedora's system-config-printer-gui fault. Go check out other distributions - namely SuSE or Mandriva (former Mandrake) - each of them handles this by their own tool - YaST (SuSE) and Mandriva Control Center... Go, see how it looks and think again not to generalize stupid stuff like:

    Fedora's printer config dialog sucks -> Linux printing status: unfriendly.
    • Yast - Seconded (Score:3, Interesting)

      by FreeLinux ( 555387 )
      Indeed, of all the interfaces to CUPS that I have seen, two stand head and shoulders above the rest. Yast is hands down the best Linux interface. The other interface worthy of note is for an Apple variety.
      • I called Apple support for a printer issue. I could print fine from the command line, but not the apps. Until that point I hadn't realized the interface was CUPS (wasn't my mac and I hadn't spent too much time with it).

        The interface is easy, but felt very restrictive. BTW, I ended up having to reinstall the OS (archive mode, worked well without messing anything up) to get the printing to work.
    • Yup. Click "Control Center" in the menu (or "settings:/" in Konqueror), click "Yast2", "Hardware" and "Printers". If you have it on USB, etc., it autodetects. Otherwise, pcik your printer from the list.

      Same as setting up any hardware.


    • by LWATCDR ( 28044 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:31PM (#12304580) Homepage Journal
      Yea Suse worked for me AFTER I tracked down a PPD file for my printer. The problem is it still takes too much fiddling around to make it work. I had to find the windows PPD, on the Xerox website, which was in a windows self extracting zip.
      • PPD is PPD - it is not Windows nor Linux nor any other system. It is quite standard.

        To be honest it is Xerox flaw, with HP you get PPD files on CDs in separate directories. Also just today I've purchased Samsung LCP-500 which is cheap semi professional color laser printer. The printer came with CD and Linux drivers. So it is due to vendor to support drivers.

        Look nobody will buy unsupported printer in order to use it with Linux - this is quite normal. Also nobody claims that every plastic-crappy-printer-bo
      • "But Mr. Dent, the PPD file has been available on our web site for the last nine months."

        "Oh yes, well, as soon as I heard I went straight round to fetch it, yesterday afternoon. You hadn't exactly gone out of your way to call attention to them, had you? I mean, like actually saying anything about it or anything."

        "But the file was available."

        "Available? I had to finagle my way into a non-advertised server to download it."

        "That's our Linux Support Server."

        "With Telnet."

        "Ah, well, the HTTP interface had
    • I recently installed debian sarge on five computers in the lab. I didn't even notice cups installing itself (as it went along with other packeges) and detecting printers. They just worked (tm).

      another story about graphics card support...
  • Wonder why? (Score:5, Funny)

    by MarkGriz ( 520778 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:24PM (#12304484)
    "OK, it was close to a year ago... that Eric Raymond's tirade on the unfriendly status of configuring the CUPS printing system on Linux was published.... and nothing seems to have changed -- the admin items for adding a printer are exactly as Eric described them back then -- unclear, confusing, and no where near as friendly as their Win* equivalents."

    Well, so much for ESR tirades motivating the development of user-friendly software. Anyone else have any ideas?
    • Maybe Eric should actually get to work and code instead - if he had done so a year ago, chances are that by now, there would be a good configuration system for CUPS.

      After all, it *is* one of the much-touted advantages of FOSS that you actually can scratch your metaphorical itches instead of having to wait for the vendor to do it.
      • Re:Wonder why? (Score:5, Insightful)

        by topham ( 32406 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:36PM (#12304640) Homepage
        So nobody is allowed to complain that something is lacking? They have to fix it themselves?

        Isn't the idea that the community can do what people can't, or won't do for themselves.

        Some people don't have time to do what would have to be done.
        • Re:Wonder why? (Score:3, Insightful)

          by MarkGriz ( 520778 )
          "So nobody is allowed to complain that something is lacking? They have to fix it themselves?"

          Of course not. ESR raised alot of issues and even got some positive response from the CUPS developers. Good for him.

          But the Ask Slashdot submitter shouldn't expect developers to fall all over themselves just because ESR says so.
      • Re:Wonder why? (Score:3, Insightful)

        by Dun Malg ( 230075 )
        Maybe Eric should actually get to work and code instead - if he had done so a year ago, chances are that by now, there would be a good configuration system for CUPS. After all, it *is* one of the much-touted advantages of FOSS that you actually can scratch your metaphorical itches instead of having to wait for the vendor to do it.

        This line of thinking is only acccurate in a theoretical sense. Unfortunately, it assumes that all people are roughly equal in competence with regard to a given task. One of the

    • Re:Wonder why? (Score:3, Informative)

      by c0d3h4x0r ( 604141 )
      Well, so much for ESR tirades motivating the development of user-friendly software. Anyone else have any ideas?

      Yeah... try paying the developers. Nothing motivates people to do unpleasant things like money will (see: the porn industry and Fear Factor).

      That's why the commercial software development model is superior in terms of responding to the desires of ordinary users.
      • You can pay free software developers, too. And, when different users have conflicting desires, you can keep different patchsets against the main code so that distributions can target different users and patch accordingly.
    • Re:Wonder why? (Score:3, Insightful)

      by waveclaw ( 43274 )
      Anyone else have any ideas?

      Even though Eric Raymond was talking about the RedHat CUPS tool, I'll bite (YHBT, etc etc.)

      The webadmin tool (http://localhost:631) is not well thought out. You start off logged out, but there is no little 'logged in / logged out' indicator like 99.9% of commercial websites have. [tt]However, in the CUPS team's favor, most OSS drops the ball on providing useful user feedback like a login status indicator (see the many Wiki's out there that suffer from this.) But then, I wri
  • no common interface (Score:5, Interesting)

    by jaymzter ( 452402 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:24PM (#12304486) Homepage
    what bugs me is I configure cups, try to print out of an app which has its own printer settings (like Moz or Acrobat), then everything gets filtered through kprint, at least on my system. So if something doesn't work, where's the problem? Also, if I use the cups admin, it breaks the fedora system config utility's settings, and vice versa. Fate and Linux are playing tricks on me!

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:24PM (#12304487)
    Open source programmers work on what is sexy. CUPS isn't sexy. You want someone to do that kind of work, you have to pay them, which is why oos will never have the same polish as commercial OSs (polish doesn't mean themes and icons guys).
  • Works like a charm in FC4 Test 2. I just plugged in a hp deskjet 3845, pressed print, and it worked. (not to mention Win* needs the HP print system programs to run this)
    • Win* actually does not need it, but HP - since they've become such a crappy system - tries to trick you into thinking you need it.

      If you dig a bit Windows will install just the driver.

      Seriously, if anyone is still using Hp printers of the ink variety, stop.
  • CUPS (Score:5, Informative)

    by loginx ( 586174 ) <> on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:27PM (#12304532) Homepage
    The built-in admin web-interface to set up cups is really just there so that an admin with no desktop can configure their print server.

    If you are an end-user, it is implied that you should be using desktop tools to accomplish this.

    Both Gnome and KDE offer very nifty printer configuration apps that will take care of setting up CUPS for you. Gnome uses gnome-cups-manager (run that from your terminal or create a launcher), while KDE uses kprinter (you can also run it from the terminal and create a shortcut).

    It is also worth mentioning that when you hit print on Mozilla Firefox, you can hit "Properties" for the printer in the print dialog and change the "Print Command" line to KPrinter to let it handle the printing in a much less convoluted way.
    • Re:CUPS (Score:4, Insightful)

      by Just Some Guy ( 3352 ) <> on Thursday April 21, 2005 @03:05PM (#12304938) Homepage Journal
      Both Gnome and KDE offer very nifty printer configuration apps [...]

      Amen to that. I'm partial to the KDEPrint system [], and wish that it was half as easy to configure network printers in Windows as it is through the nice KDE GUI.

      For those who didn't catch that, let me repeat it: in my experience, it's much easier to configure printers (particular network servers) in KDE than it is in Windows. As far as I'm concerned, this particular problem is well solved.

      • Are you serious? (Score:3, Informative)

        by geekoid ( 135745 )
        I haven't set up a printer in Linux for years. and when I did it didn't support all the printer features. I am sure thats changed, and I see that it might have become as easy as windows,
        But easier then windows? I bought a printer, plugged it in and it worked. Never took the driver out of the box.
        How is it easier then that? did Linus come to your house and put in on your desk for you?

        Coincidentaly, I installed a network printer at the office. My desktop Win 2k machine just picked it up.
  • by dominator ( 61418 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:28PM (#12304534) Homepage
    Using the FC3 printer configuration tool, I checked the "share this printer" box. It asked me to give the printer a name, which I did.

    I went downstairs to my GF's Powerbook running OSX 10.3.x and told it that I would like to add a network printer. It found the printer that I had created. I clicked "print a test page" and everything "just worked." I don't see how it could get much easier.
  • The KISS Principal (Score:5, Insightful)

    by WombatControl ( 74685 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:28PM (#12304537)

    One of the problems with FLOSS is that it tends to be written by hackers (which is also one of its biggest benefits, but I digress)...

    Hackers want lots of options. They want to be able to configure FIFO settings for serial printers and flow controls, and all the technical nitty gritty.

    Grandma doesn't know what the hell a flow control is. All she wants to do is a print a picture the grandkids sent her.

    The biggest barrier to FLOSS usability is often overwhelming the user with too many options. A good GUI presents the most basic options you need to accomplish a task, and hides the rest where Grandma won't find it, but where someone who wants to change some deep, dark setting has the option of doing so.

    IMHO, Mac OS X Gets It Right. Their configuration dialogs are quite simple, but you can always get under the hood if you need to. That sort of ease of use is what makes OS X a Unix that Grandma can use.

    And if it takes messing about with obscure settings to get things to work, then the back end needs to be refined until the system works.

    Complexity is at odds with usability, and in general FLOSS tends to be balanced more towards the former than the latter.

    • While you're certainly right that I want configurability on things I understand, there's also the other half that many hackers and code monkeys miss - most of us learn by dinking around with things. Get a good handle on the mindset something was built with, and then use that to better figure out the rest. If the initial ramp up on something as simple as a printing system takes many hours or even a day or two to even get basic functionality working, chances are I'm going to declare it "crap" and go back t
    • by Hognoxious ( 631665 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:46PM (#12304739) Homepage Journal
      A good GUI presents the most basic options you need to accomplish a task, and hides the rest where Grandma won't find it, but where someone who wants to change some deep, dark setting has the option of doing so.
      I'm inclined to agree. The more I think about it the more I come to the conclusion that many usability problems can be solved - without loss of flexibility when it's needed - by the judicious application of either an 'idiot button' or 'expert mode'.
  • There are tools avaliable that makes setting printers up a breeze. None of the ones i use are proprerity so any dist can use them. While i admit that the cups GUI should be better laid out and more userfriendly i think many users dont really see this problem.

    The thing that pops into my mind is the question:

    Why doesnt those who feel this is a real problem fix it?

  • I recommend it as a way of setting up printers. The functionality is the same but it looks nicer and seems easier to use for those without cups experience. I don't know if there's a gnome equivalent.
  • How 'bout the book? (Score:5, Informative)

    by TVmisGuided ( 151197 ) <> on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:30PM (#12304567) Homepage

    Not long ago, there was a Slashdot review [] of a certain book [], which included a chapter on CUPS that can be downloaded for free [] (can't beat that price!). It seems to demystify the entire process of administering CUPS.

    Five cents, please...(that's about all my opinion is worth these days)

    • Well but this argument is not over CUPS itself - CUPS is just printing engine - it can have multiple frontends like MOX's one (good), Fedora's one (apparently bad), Mandrivas one, SuSE's one etc. you can even go to /etc/cups/ and use your $EDITOR and it will be fine. CUPS is not about config GUI - it is about few config files than you can edit and config files themselves are quite OK for me.

      It is the same like you would say that Apache is not friendly because some distros GUI sucks... It is not the point a
    • Five cents, please...(that's about all my opinion is worth these days)

      Lucky you. Mine's only worth two.

    • The point is, the average user shouldn't need to read a BOOK to set up a printer
  • Please. (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Dogun ( 7502 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:32PM (#12304588) Homepage
    My experience with setting up CUPS is the exact opposite. I agree that it has not improved over the past year, but it *IS* remarkably simple to set up a printer with CUPS. I got it on my second try, back a bit over a year ago, and have reconfigured cups maybe 10 times since then, without any trouble.

    What's so hard about clicking on "Manage Printers" and then "Add Printer"?

    Among my recent linux converts, they described CUPS as being relatively hastle free, and superior to the oft-broken process under Windows.
  • Gave up on CUPS (Score:3, Informative)

    by British ( 51765 ) <> on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:34PM (#12304620) Homepage Journal
    I admit, I was stumped with the whole setting up the printer in CUPs. I had a friend who works in Linux daily set it up. We had to set up a few test printers, and then try to navigate to the IP address of it(on 2K for internet printing).

    After all was said and done, any printout I made printed about 90% of the page, and then it was garbage city. And as a general rule with messed-up printings, all garbage that prints out a form feed every few lines or so. So it's not one page of garbage characters, it's a stack of them.

    Eventually I just gave up, and will be just using a Win98 box with sharing for all print jobs.
  • by stinky wizzleteats ( 552063 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:34PM (#12304622) Homepage Journal
    I've always heard a lot of bad things about CUPS, but have only had occaision to use it over the past year or so. Maybe I've just been lucky, or CUPS is a whole lot easier to mess with on Gentoo, but I've never had any problems with it.
  • I hate to say it but this is one area windows has it all over Linux. On a windows machine I can setup a printer in under 10 seconds. On my Linux box I still have yet to make it work.

    In windows setting up a printer is as easy as \\servername\ printersharename

    On the server adding that printer to be available to clients is just a matter of knowing what port, or IP its on (which configures a "port" when you provide the IP during setup). This again is a minor job.

    I've tried, several times to get CUPS working and ave found it the stupidest sub system in all of UNIX. There has got to be a better way, but I haven't found it yet, has anyone else?

    I have been able to get everything I have ever needed working in Linux in the past simply bu reading the man pages and how-to's but neither seems to have the answers for CUPS.

    My printer in my house is on a printer server box. Configuring printing should be trivial. Privide a printer type and an IP and GO.
    • Whilst I agree that setting up a CUPS server is still a pain - mostly because of the lack of decent documentation - once your server is up and running then workstation is even easier than the process described for Windows in the parent article.

      All you have to do is - nothing at all! I can take a virgin PC, connect it to my network, boot with a Knoppix CD, start and all my printers are there and ready to use. No configuration, no drivers, no \\servername\printername. As soon as I do File=
  • I'll admit I screen my hardware, but I've had very little trouble with CUPS using System-Admin->Printing in GNOME 2.10.1 (ubuntu.) I clicked "new printer," "forward" (aka "next'), and "apply." it detected it and selected the driver. I didn't have to do anything but make sure it was right.

    I don't know anything about fedora. I also have had trouble in the past with using my own ppd files. But I think the interface was just fine.

    As for general printing problems? There are plenty. Just because your printer
  • by Stephen Samuel ( 106962 ) <samuel AT bcgreen DOT com> on Thursday April 21, 2005 @02:43PM (#12304708) Homepage Journal
    I've got a friend who's got a USB printer on Win-XP. It seems like every time they unplug the printer and plug it in, it occurs as a different instance -- which means that the printer needs to be installed yet again. I'm gonna be heading over to his place this weekend to help solve the problem.

    Printers are, generally, a bit of a pain in the ass. There are way too many proprietary drivers and driver styles, and I really don't see the need for it.
    Why can't these manufacturers define a standardized, extensible interface format for their printers and end this madness once and for all?

  • heh, hehe, heh, you said see you pee
  • And Eric is very good at pointless ranting

    now, if he would implement a solution ...

    not that i would care, dead tree format is clumsy
  • Only in Ameri^H^H^H^H^HLinux...
  • Autodetection (Score:3, Insightful)

    by VStrider ( 787148 ) <`ku.oc.oohay' `ta' `zm_sinnaig'> on Thursday April 21, 2005 @03:02PM (#12304901)
    CUPS autodetects your printer, but then asks you how your printer is connected? (locally,cups,jetdirect etc.).

    It *knows* i have no jetdirect or network printer, that the printer is connected on lp0 and it correctly detects the model.

    Why it needs to ask me how the printer is connected is beyond me. This can only confuse new users.
  • by Animats ( 122034 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @03:05PM (#12304934) Homepage
    Printing should work roughly like this:

    You ask an application to print something. At most, you should have to specify which printer. The system should have figured out by itself everything it needs to know about directly attached printers. Anything on the local network that offers printing should have already been recognized. Faraway printers may have to be specified in some way, but even there, you'd expect a directory system or search engine to do the heavy lifting. There should be no need for explicit "system administration".

    That's how it should work. Yes, it's not easy to do it that way. Yes, there are some older printers that can't be automatically identified via their electrical interface. Yes, sometimes the system may have to find and download some format conversion program.

  • by printman ( 54032 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @03:24PM (#12305154) Homepage
    Most of Eric's comments are NOT about CUPS, but instead about the various GUIs that have been written to run on top of CUPS.

    Regarding the CUPS web interface, there is actually a LOT of development happening for the new CUPS 1.2 release to make things work much more smoothly, ask the user less questions when they don't need to be asked, and move the web interface to a more task-oriented UI instead of the current function-oriented UI.

    For example, in the new web interface the "add printer" button will list any printers that CUPS discovers automatically ("Epson Stylus RX300 on USB port") - you just click on "add listed printers" to add the printers, or "add printer manually" to add one manually. Similarly, printer sharing, remote administration, etc. are now check boxes on the administration page instead of going through the cupsd.conf file.

    Anyways, good changes ARE coming for the native CUPS interfaces, and I only hope that the Linux distributors follow suit with their GUIs...
  • Mm... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by ledow ( 319597 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @03:48PM (#12305447) Homepage
    Being a bit of a Linux newbie as it comes to anything past a router, firewall or Samba, I can see that there are a few problems with CUPS but nothing show-stopping.

    So long as you know about, you're set. The procedure via gui consists of: Connect with a web browser, add a new printer, give it a name, select a port (which admittedly can have some confusing options as many "ports" are available for a single, physical port), select a printer.

    For bog-standard printers like HP Laserjet, you just select anything that looks HP-like until you can get to select your printer. For others (for example, my Samsung ML-4500 or inkjets etc.), download a PPD, install it in the right place beforehand and options will arise for that printer.

    No, it's not 100% clear or simple but then not much in Linux ever is, but I have to say that CUPS is one of the easiest parts of my Linux setup. X, KDE and ALSA have given me ten times more problems. And once CUPS is up, so much uses it and detects it that you really have very few problems, KDE, Samba, etc.

    Compared to the APSFilter (with all it's Ghostscript support) that I used to use for printer-servers prior to discovering CUPS it's a dream. I'd have to say that CUPS needs one or two minor tweaks to it's GUI, not much worse than that and even one or two lines of explanatory text or a web-link to Linux Printing's HOWTO would let it be used by even the simplest of Linux users.
  • I agree with E.R. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by rnturn ( 11092 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @03:55PM (#12305542)

    ``For those who are still frustrated with the CUPS GUI, how would you improve it?''

    Each time I make an attempt to tackle CUPS, I find that the easiest way to deal with configuring it is to delete that package and load LPRng. At least it's something that you can get working in a reasonable amount of time.

  • The point (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Sunspire ( 784352 ) on Thursday April 21, 2005 @06:35PM (#12307892)
    Everyone is screaming "just use Yast", "use the webinterface" or "system-config-printer isn't that bad". That's not the point. Here's the scenario:
    The user plugs in a printer. There is no step two. If there was no printer before, the printer is now the default. There is no need to tell the machine about it this, no GUI popping up, no config programs to run. If there was a previous default printer the user can right-click its icon representation in some control center to make it the default, otherwise it is just a choice in the print preview dialog.

    Stop bitching that CUPS is good enough. Informing us that tool X does what you want it to do is of no worth whatsoever. That is simply taking the easy road. Open Source can, and will given enough time, do better. By failing to see the problems you are just hurting Open Source by your zealotry.

    Whether some other operating system does it in some other way is completely irrelevant. The nature of Open Source is to iteratively approach a perfect state. There is no part too small or insignificant, or grand and important, that we can not improve it. Every single wording of every label is open to refinement, every padding issue of every widget open to tweaking to perfection. And when the system plain sucks we rip it out and do it again. The only constant factor in Open Source is change and improvement, 365 days a year 24 hours a day. The shop never closes, on Christmas day there is a million CVS checkins around the globe. That is what Open Source is all about. I put very real code where my mouth is, if your contribution to Open Source consists of "well, it works for me", SHUT THE FUCK UP, in your shortsightedness you hurt Open Source and I as a developer will rather have 5 guys pointing out flaws than you promoting the status quo.
    • by pherthyl ( 445706 )
      The shop never closes, on Christmas day there is a million CVS checkins around the globe.

      And on Valentine's Day, there are a billion. ;)

No problem is so large it can't be fit in somewhere.