Open Source Collaborative and Presentation Tools? 28
An anonymous reader asks: "I've been asked to discuss collaboration tools at un upcoming meeting. Things like Groove, DocuShare, and WebEx all have significant costs associated with them, so I'm curious to know what everyone on Slashdot is using (if anything). What kind of software would you use to enable simultaneous document editing with version control, or to sync presentations across participant browsers for an online meeting, etc?"
it's not open source but... (Score:3, Informative)
Collaborative Editing (Score:3, Informative)
DocSynch [sourceforge.net] is a plugin for jEdit [jedit.org] which used IRC for collaborative editing.
SangamPlugin [sourceforge.net] adds collaborative editing to Eclipse [eclipse.org].
Old school? Use VimSynch [vi-improved.org] or Emacs [gnu.org] or any text-mode editor with screen [19inch.net].
Not OSS but free (Score:2)
Re:Not OSS but free (Score:2, Interesting)
not real time collaborative, netmeeting can have only one cursor in a file
not real time collaborative, wiki wont let you see real time as someone else is typing
Re:Not OSS but free (Score:1)
countdown till someone makes an AJAX'ian wiki...3....2.....1....
e.
(I think that would be both maddening and intriguing at the same time)
it would be real time collaborative (Score:1)
And if one doesn't like Netmeeting, one can user an OSS application that supports H.323 such as GNOMEMeeting
Re:Not OSS but free (Score:2)
This is like saying "not free, needs a computer".
Re:Not OSS but free (Score:1, Troll)
But, no computers with Windows.
For the record, none of them even came with Windows.
So... how is it the same?
Funny you should mention that. (Score:2, Interesting)
Trac SCM (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Trac SCM (Score:3, Informative)
The timeline feature alone is worthwhile - throw in the Roadmap. All it needs is a better ticket workflow (selectable per ticket) and it easier support for multiple projects and it would be perfect.
Maybe try Groupkit (Score:1)
I haven't used it for a few years, but you might want to take a look at GroupKit (http://www.groupkit.org/ [groupkit.org] and on Sourceforge). It has things like shared workspaces, whiteboards and chat capabilites.
Also, a Google search for "CSCW" (Computer Supported Collaborative Working -- the term used in academic circles for this kind of thing) may throw up some useful stuff.
links: WikiPedia entry, Gobby, Yarrr (Score:1)
VNC and audioconferencing (Score:2)
A new OSS website for Open Source collaboration. (Score:2)
It's meant to be an easy to use single
Re: Collaborative tools (Score:3, Informative)
MediaWiki [sourceforge.net]
It's been used to edit a 600,000-page document over at Wikipedia [wikipedia.org], where it seems to cope okay with about 6000 simultaneous editors. It has version control, file uploads, image support, etc. which means that you should be able to create most types of document with it.
Windows Sharepoint Services (Score:1)
microsoft built-in and others (Score:3, Informative)
Nifty one (Score:2, Informative)
This is a Jabber client with integrated whiteboard, all built in TCL/Tk so it builds and runs on Windows, Linux and OS X.
Groove (Score:3, Informative)
We use Groove for coordinating a small development team in the US, UK and Germany. We bought Groove because we wanted a common communication, calendar and file store. It's generally quite nice, but:
The bad:
- It's very slow. The task management (Gantt chart) tool becomes unusably slow with any reasonably sized project.
- The chat tool is crap. We went back to xchat after a few days trying to use it.
- The UI is annoying, with lots of unneccessary flashing and changes
The good:
- Most of the tools are pretty good: meetings, web link repository etc all work nicely
- File syncing seems to work pretty well
It's a very nice idea and it works pretty well, it's just not quite well polished enough yet. An OSS alternative virtual office would be very welcome: I would imagine a lot of it could be built using already complete projects: webdav, rsync etc.
TWiki (Score:1)
It has fairly extensive plugin structure, a very nice pdf export functions and extensive access controls. Sometime IM chats logs are just copy-pasted straight in. If you use your wiki words consistently, it all tightly integrates conceptually. The RSS feeds are also very useful. Kind of a delayed chat...
This is especially great since we have people on four conti
You may want to check out Silk (Score:2)