Ask Slashdot: What To Do With Spammers You Know? 333
courteaudotbiz writes "For years, a business named Compu-Finder has been sending spam all around the province of Quebec, Canada. In their emails, there is a phone number where we can reach them, and an unsubscribe link that you can click and seems to work, but even after asking them on the phone, by email or with their unsubscribe link, to unsubscribe me, I still receive 10 — 15 spams a week coming from this company. Many bloggers, journalists and radio chroniclers talked about them, but they seem to be untouchable. Still, it is easy to find the names, addresses and phone numbers of the shareholders and administrators of the company. How can we, collectively, take action to make them understand that we do not like their mass mailing practice?"
Aren't there laws against that? (Score:4)
Re: (Score:2)
I lock them in my basement, then Christopher Walken and I prank them.
Re: (Score:3)
If that doesn't work, go to their offices and switch off the main power panel a few times until they get the hint.
Also helps against neighbours who play loud music in the middle of the night...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Document it thoroughly and submit a report to the authorities. If that doesn't work, go to their offices and switch off the main power panel a few times until they get the hint.
I was thinking more along the lines of thermite bomb on top of the main building transformer. Problem is that their servers are probably virtualized on some offshore blade farm.
Re: (Score:3)
No, their host is theplanet.com in texas. (do an nslookup on their latest site name theutraining.com - 174.123.135.180 - they keep changing it, for obvious reasons).
Report it to abuse@theplanet.com
Re: (Score:2)
...If that doesn't work, go to their offices and switch off the main power panel a few times until they get the hint.
Uhhh...yeah...speaking of "laws against that"...
CC the Attorney General (Score:2)
Next time you send them an email or letter, be sure to CC your Attorney General.
Re: (Score:2)
Getting your point across (Score:5, Insightful)
How can we, collectively, take action to make them understand that we do not like their mass mailing practice?
Are you under the impression that spam continues because people think we like it? That if they only understood how much we don't like it, they would stop?
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
How can we, collectively, take action to make them understand that we do not like their mass mailing practice?
Are you under the impression that spam continues because people think we like it? That if they only understood how much we don't like it, they would stop?
I just hope that doesn't mean you are one of the mindless masses who believes that spam is sent out purely to make people angry or waste their time. People of even moderate intellect realize that spam is all about money, and the only way to stop the spam is to stop the flow of money to the spammers - or at least make it more difficult for them to get so much money so easily.
Re: (Score:2)
I always wondered who would even read a spam message, let alone respond to it. Has anyone here ever met someone who bought something off a spam email? Someone must be doing it, I just can't imagine who.
Re: (Score:3)
The issue with spam is that it is so cheap that even incredibly low rates of return can still be profitable. Like one in a million rates of return, or even the prospect of one day getting a single hit.
Re: (Score:2)
People fall for those Nigerian prince scams a few times per year.. reasonable to expect if someone can fall for that, someone can fall for anything. More importantly, the cost per spam is so cheap that even if you only get a few people per million emails, you probably make money.
Re: (Score:3)
Commerce isn't the majority of spam these days... most of it (that I've ever seen that is) is worm chatter. Bots trying to spread the infection.
Re: (Score:2)
Alternatively, make their expenses exceed the income or make the degradation to their quality of life exceed the value they derive (tell their kids "your daddy is a dirty spammer and the whole world hates him").
One must be careful not to cross any legal boundaries, but that leaves plenty of room for a bit of personal feedback when you know their physical location.
Re: (Score:2)
Correct. It continues because they think it is effective.
Contact the group being advertised for.
Tell them you will not use their services, explain why (including the firm).
Don't use their services.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Thus the issue is being handled at the wrong end. Create a spam system yourself, and spam Quebec. Some small number of people will respond positively to your campaign. Use the profits from the campaign to hire assassins and have those people killed.
When you can no longer afford to hire killers to eliminate people that respond positively to spam, the problem will have been defacto resolved.
In order to eliminate ethical concerns, this process should probably be automated - otherwise the profits might actually
Re: (Score:2)
1) Start a business. ... ?
2) Send spam, ostensibly advertising your competitors.
3)
4) Profit!
Re: (Score:3)
True. The thing with spam, like much advertising, is that it's based on wishful thinking and something almost like superstition. They spend money on advertising, and unless they're a huge megacorporation doing serious market research, they just sort of hope that it pays off. Unless there is a big dive in profits that correlates with a marketing campaign, ideally with many angry letters to give the marketroids a hint at what's going on, they'll assume it's all hunky-dory.
They spam, profits are roughly the sa
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe it's the latter. I know that computer-illiterate grannies and total morons buy stuff from spam ads (basically the 419 victim crowd), but I can't imagine the number of them is great enough to make any significant profit for the businesses that advertise through spamming. The act of spamming itself I know is profitable, no question about that...
Re: (Score:2)
You can even take the "think" out of there..
Spam is effective because it's ultra cheap and there are just enough people who will go for it.
Re: (Score:2)
I have done this once or twice. Its amazing how much people don't get it when you call up complaining about their advertising practices.
Generally the people willing to advertise with spam are of the opinion that, if you don't want their service, you should just hit delete, and not call them.
Re: (Score:3)
Report them to their ISP.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
How can we, collectively, take action to make them understand that we do not like their mass mailing practice?
Are you under the impression that spam continues because people think we like it? That if they only understood how much we don't like it, they would stop?
Are you under the impression that spam continues for the fun of it, just to annoy people?
Root cause analysis my friend. There would be no spam if there were not plenty of idiots still generating click revenue behind it.
Re:Getting your point across (Score:4, Interesting)
Rather, his request is a thinly-veiled plea for vigilante/mass action from the Slashdot community. That kind of making them understand.
Like calling 1.800.861.6618 [theutraining.com] or emailing them at conseil@theumanage.com [mailto] (ooh, that's the first time I've made a mailto link in a /. discussion — wonder if it'll work) or at conseil@www.cfcible.com [mailto], or just visiting their website a bunch.
Which could actually happen, I wouldn't be surprised. I stand by, curiously awaiting report of the results.
Don't call or unsubscribe (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Don't call or unsubscribe (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Don't call or unsubscribe (Score:4, Insightful)
as for unsubscribing, well, that just shows them that a live human actually is at that address and reading email from spammers.. Goldstrike if you called and unsubscribed.
If they use the unsubscribe link in order to actively maintain you on their list, that smells like fraud to me.
Remember that something doesn't have to be in direct contravention of your country's Data Protection Act (or equivalent) to be spam -- contract law still holds, and if they offer a way to unsubscribe, you take it and they don't unsubscribe you, that's a breach of agreed terms.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, and considering the value of the relationship you can sue to collect your $0. The "agreed terms" are certainly being abrogated but you do not have anything of value happening here.
A court is more likely to fine you for wasting their time.
Re: (Score:2)
Mind you I'm not a lawyer or any sort of professional legal person and am going on my limited knowledge of US law, maybe Canada is different or there is something I'm not aware of.
Mycroft
Re: (Score:2)
actually, they somehow seem not to like when people call them. i usually look up some number, cal it. i start with "hi, do you receive spam ?" - "um... yes" (who doesn't ?) - "do you like it ?" - "...no" (some get suspicious here, some don't) - "then why do you send spam ?"
and here i take some time to rant about spam. sometimes they are very like "sorry" and such, then i just rant for a while. sometimes they are aggressive and go like "what's your problem, just delete it" - then i become slightly more rude,
show up at their door (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
this. Occupy their main office. Bill them for their services of delivering you junk mail. Submit to collection agencies. Show up at their houses. The usual stuff.
Re: (Score:2)
Nothing else seems to work.
Re: (Score:2)
I suppose "high explosives" wasn't the answer the guy was looking for.
Arson is your friend. (Score:5, Informative)
Really, it's the only way to get through to some people.
Re: (Score:3)
Anonymous... sounds like a job for .... (Score:2)
dun dun duh.....
Re: (Score:3)
Hey! My cat says that when she is made aware of the existence of any other cat...
Well, not in those exact words, but she can't actually speak. The intent is clear though.
I wonder if I could train her to go into these homicidal rages at spammers?
If Fire Doesn't Work (Score:2)
Nuke it from orbit, it's the only way to be sure.
Re:If Fire Doesn't Work (Score:4, Funny)
Been [userfriendly.org] done [userfriendly.org].
Didn't work [userfriendly.org].
DNS block (Score:2)
Add a entry in your mail server to drop everything from their netblock. Better yet, block them at your DNS, too.
Re: (Score:3)
Now, they just come at you from a new IP address within hours.
Greylisting [wikipedia.org] is your friend. Your mail server gives them a service temporarily unavailable error. If their mail server follows the SMTP standard, it comes back a few hours later from the same IP address and gets let through. Most spammers are interested in volume, and don't waste resources following up like that. And if they do, and it happens to be a new IP address, then they get delayed again for having a new IP address.
It doesn't take long for Greylisting filters to learn legitimate hosts, especially if
As a start... (Score:5, Funny)
Publicise the names and personal details of their CEO and board of directors.
Subscribe their email addresses to every spam product and service you can find.
Re:As a start... (Score:4, Informative)
Or better, pull a Ralsky on 'em... http://slashdot.org/story/02/12/06/1554227/howto-annoy-a-spammer [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Get together a list of people who are willing to take action. Get board member and managment phone numbers.
Start calling them, 24/7. No person call more than once a day. Coordinate times, so that they receive calls every ten minutes, 24 hours a day. It is important that no one person call more than once per day. If you have 140 people, you can call every ten minutes for an entire day with no duplicates. If the phone answers, provide a polite, succinct message such as, "Please stop sending me email".
Contact your ISP (Score:2)
First Hand Experience... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:First Hand Experience... (Score:4, Interesting)
and I work on the other end, supporting a few million email accounts. I like ESPs like you, because you work diligently to keep your senders on the up and up, but this scumbag will just move on to some other ESP, or worse, start connecting with hosted email providers like us, and spam from there.
There is no way to defend against it EXCEPT to put their phone numbers and domains in black lists from the start. That, and as per a suggestion above, kill it with fire.
Re: (Score:2)
Court? (Score:2)
Have you considered taking them to court?
Or you could just filter or even tarpit their mail servers and forget about it. If you use free webmail just click the spam button on each mail and sooner or later they will get blocked.
I think there are a few companies like that. I get constant spam from a bunch of jokers calling themselves clubline football.
How to fight spam (Score:2)
Oh, wait, you wanted something effective, didn't you?
If you want to fight spam effectively you need to focus on the prime motivation behind spam - money. Spam is sent out because people make money sending it out. Ordinarily spam is sent out by a company other than the spamvertised company, which gives you a few more avenues to explore. There are, however, a few things you can still look into.
First, who is the registrar behind
Re: (Score:3)
The CAN-SPAM act loses what little punch it has as soon as you cross the state line from New York into Quebec . . .
Re: (Score:2)
The first sentence of the summary says
For years, a business named Compu-Finder has been sending spam all around the province of Quebec, Canada
Is CAN-SPAM Canadian?
Re: (Score:2)
Is CAN-SPAM Canadian?
CAN-SPAM. Canadian-SPAM Act. Makes perfect sense to me.
This is Canada (Score:2)
cosumer rights here are shit. Get some signs, friends and park your ass at their door. Piitch forks could be used if not enough sings are available.
Re:This is Canada (Score:5, Interesting)
Ah, but it's Quebec.
Make sure they follow the language laws, if not, report them to the language police. They're apparently quite vicious.
Also, Quebec has very special status in Canada since they basically want to do everything themselves and only give token attention to Ottawa (they have their own sales tax - QST, that the Harper Government (tm) is paying $4B or so for them to change it to an "H" to implement the HST which would do the same thing). Quebec can easily make it very hard for a business that's not obeying its laws to do business inside Quebec, even if they're not in Quebec.
It's why in Canada there's lots of things that are "excluding Quebec" - not just sweepstakes/lottos/etc, but also products that basically are unavailable to be shipped to Quebec. They have the requisite French, but they don't meet some other part of Quebec law and are therefore disallowed.
Re: (Score:3)
Quebec has a special legal status in Canada because Canada is still, last I checked, a federation.
That being said, Francophones are welcoming, friendly people. Some people live here without ever uttering a French word and Quebecois go out of their way to accommodate them. Those who want to learn French are actually annoyed by it.
Montreal is a truly multicultural city, and every small culture is free to express itself, in all manners, restaurants, soccer team fans, and they are and do feel appreciated.
Look a
Small Claims (Score:2)
Small claims courts are easier if you're a local. There's no way I could sue them, but you could.
Block it and move on (Score:4, Insightful)
Just block their domain and get on with your life. If you value your time at, say, $20/hr, how much are you willing to spend in order to get nothing in return?
Re:Block it and move on (Score:5, Interesting)
Ironically, getting nothing is exactly what he wants. It's funny how much time we spend trying to get people to stop wasting our time.
Re:Block it and move on (Score:5, Interesting)
After all the spam I've gotten in the past ~15 years? If I found out there was a spammer in my own city, I'd be willing to spend at least a couple of evenings trying to shut them down.
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
why not help others? (Score:5, Insightful)
At first glance we see this is the personally efficient way to handle the situation. Block their mail and move on. But then we might wonder if we're being a little selfish, not engaging our computer skills to help out others, the many others who are negatively affected by this spam. A little altruism is generally recognized as a noble thing...
This could lead us to thinking about the systems that have been developed for reporting spam, how individuals have been empowered to spend little effort in reporting, and how, when summed, that individually trivial effort, of thousands and thousands of people, collectively makes powerful anti-spam effect.
Then maybe we complete the circle, realizing that we are the beneficiaries of these powerful anti-spam systems, that our time is greatly saved by these systems, and that we are not just being altruistic in our contributions, we are helping ourselves.
The personally efficient way to handle many things is this way, being helpful to the larger community that you are by nature a member of, and personally capitalizing on the beneficial effects of the economies of scale and other mass dynamics/synergistic effects.
This is where selfishness meets altruism. So, why not help others, when you are really helping yourself?
Re: (Score:3)
Just block their domain and get on with your life. If you value your time at, say, $20/hr, how much are you willing to spend in order to get nothing in return?
The satisfaction of seing a spammer ruined would be worth several hours of my time for me. Sure it is pure and evil revenge. However, doing to them the only thing that makes them stop is... well, the only road you can take to eventually make them stop.
Blocking their domain seems like the low-cost solution. Until you realize that you need to block not only their domain, but hundreds of others as well. Increasing the risk of spamming by making them pay, on the other hand, has effects beyond the one you sued o
Pirated software (Score:2)
I heard on IRC that they use pirated software to spam, although I have no first hand knowledge or documentation. Are there not paramilitary heavily armed SWAT team like organizations that break down doors, like we have in the land-of-the-unfree to your south?
Also CP is sold by spammers, and they are spammers, so they probably traffic in CP, correct? The legal system loves to bust CP distributors.
Do Nothing, let Spamgourmet take care of it. (Score:2)
I've had the issues as the original poster. So, about 6 years ago, when I was about to change email addresses anyway, I signed up for an account at Spamgourmet.com [spamgourmet.com]. I hoped that I would never need to worry about unsubscribing again.
It works perfectly. I place unique characters in every address that I give out online. The first 'n' messages to a particular address get forwarded to my main address. After that, they get eaten by spamgourmet. I have to manually increase the limit or designate an exclusive
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Fight spam with real mail (Score:3, Interesting)
You can get a instruction manual on this subject.. (Score:2)
Right here. [amazon.com]
Like a telemarketer (Score:3)
And never, ever, ever click unsubscribe from anyone but the most reputable companies. It lets the spammers know that someone at that address actually reads those emails, and they don't mind sharing it with their sister companies.
Spamhaus (Score:2)
File a lawsuit! Or many! (Score:5, Informative)
Within a week after I had been contacted by one drug spammer that I sued, my spam load went down by 50%.
Another Spammer I sued, put in place a strong anti-spam policy and apparently quite effective.
When I went after Avtech Direct (Arlene Sediqzad and Gary Hunziker ) for spamming, I also helped arrange 21 lawsuits against them. After this was over, Sediqzad told me she wish she never heard of e-mail, and had not heard of it until Gary Hunziker got her into using it. Another spammer, Robert Smoley [sun-sentinel.com], stopped, only because he was charged, pled guilty, and sentenced to 40 months. They also seized over $40M of money and property from him. I think that is one of my most productive 45 minute phone calls with an IRS agent ever.
But this company you talk to is like Smoley, or Ralsky who needs to be sued multiple times or imprisoned for a while before they stop spamming.
Fight fire with fire (Score:2)
Make sure every Spammer and their dog knows their business email address. And keep an eye open for changes to follow suit.
FIrebomb them and their datacenter (Score:2)
Then the harassment will stop.
We need a few examples made.
Re: (Score:2)
Nah, firebombs are too impersonal, and then you need a message sent out of band...messy.
Far better to do it up Cartel style...find them... leave them hanging from bridges, with the word "Spammer" cut crudely into their flesh.
It may be tempting to scrap "OPT OUT" followed by your email address... but this is not recommended for reasons that are left as an exercise for the reader.
Which is not to say the former action is recommended, mind you. However, I am pretty sure that I wouldn't cry over the brutal loss
If you're willing to spend money on a stamp... (Score:3)
Or, even better, if you can get their fax number how about full-color Goatse in the mail or by fax? By email too, but Goatse coming out of a fax machine seems like it would be a nice gift to send them.
My favorite response (Score:2)
I read about someone who responded to them with a carefully written contract, saying that they have the email address for business purposes, and by emailing him at that address, they were entering into a business relationship with him. In doing so, they were liable for his billing purposes, and that every email would be billed at his normal billing, in hour increments.
And that continuing to email him was considered an agreement of terms. And ask them to kindly provide their billing address.... and legal ser
Re: (Score:3)
Ad to your letter that one of the services that your business provides is "marketing consulting", and that the address they are sending the spam to is the evaluation request address. Thus, by submitti
Its simple... (Score:2)
It rhymes with "shmashmit shmurder".
In the U.S. (Score:2)
The Canadian Government is working on it... (Score:2)
The legislation hasn't been passed yet, but it's on the table.
Re: (Score:2)
In (North) America you ... (Score:2)
Sue them! That's the American way! Or do Le Québécois not think they are in North America?
I do not recommend... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Auto-Forward rule (Score:3)
Send them an email, carboned to every email address for everybody in the company you can find. That email says something along the lines of:
I am getting a large amount of spam emails from your company. I have tried normal channels to get them to stop, but they have actually gotten worse. I am appealing to you to put a halt to these emails. I will forward you examples of the emails I have received.
Then set up an auto-forward rule that forwards every single spam to that same list, with the text:
Here is an example of the spam I am receiving from your company. As I acquire more examples, I will forward them on as well.
I bet they'll stop in a few days.
Re: (Score:2)
Wrong "we'.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This relies on them even caring, the return address being even vaguely valid and them actually bothering to do more than just redirect incoming mail to /dev/null, let alone bothering to have someone on the payroll who will read emails from people they've spammed.
Re: (Score:2)
No!
Do not break the law to end this. Stay within the law, there's plenty of legal options at your disposal to make their business truly miserable.
Re: (Score:2)
Although that does sound like an effective way to fight spammers you'll have to do it anonymously since they could charge you with spamming.
That does actually sounds like it would be very effective. Just be sure not to trip any anti-spam filters with your randomized text, perhaps instead of random you'll want to do some combination of words that they would not want to filter such as "Where do you want me to send my credit card information?" or "I will gladly help you smuggle your money out of your country.
Re: (Score:2)
There's also the "Act to promote the efficiency and adaptability of the Canadian economy by regulating certain activities that discourage reliance on electronic means of carrying out commercial activities, and to amend the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission Act, the Competition Act, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act and the Telecommunications Act" [justice.gc.ca] (They couldn't agree on a short title) that was passed last year, though the implementation of it is movin
Re: (Score:2)
Ah yes, the AtPtEaAotCEbRCAtDRoEMoCOCAatAtCRTaTCAtCAtPIPaEDAatTA Act. Rolls right off the tongue.
Or is "Act to promote the efficiency and adaptability of the Canadian economy by regulating certain activities that discourage reliance on electronic means of carrying out commercial activities, and to amend the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission Act, the Competition Act, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act and the Telecommunications Act" actually the acronym [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Wrong focus. While at first pass it may seem that blocking email based on country affiliation makes sense because of the ratio of spam/ham you get from them, you need to look at the meaning of the criterion you're using. Yes, there will be some correlation between governance and spam, but that correlation is loose, and the collateral damage is (theoretically) oppression by geography. These people already have screwed up governments, why make it harder for them to be global citizens?
There are other ways t
Re: (Score:2)
I wondered about the efficacy of SpamCop's facilitated reporting to abuse operators.
The other side of this coin, however, is that SpamCop themselves learn more about the reported emails/systems, and they run a DNSBL which could pick up those systems.
Analogous to large ESPs offering "delete spam" actions that teach their systems what's spam.