Can WINE Be Ported to OS X? 14
geek asks: "With all the buzz around Darwin running XFree86, is there any hope of porting WINE to OS X? This could be a major factor for some people to move over to the platform. Since OS X has some FreeBSD roots my guess is it wouldn't be terribly hard to get WINE working under it. Now that Apple has an OS with UNIX in the floor boards the possibilities seem endless."
processor compatibility (Score:2)
# cat .sig
What I want to know is... (Score:2)
BOCHS is probably more likely but... (Score:3)
What was the question? (Score:1)
Could WINE be ported to Darwin?
Then the answer is yes but it would only actually work under Darwin for Intel and would require quite some effort
If the question means:
Could WINE run under MacOS X on my PPC?
Then the answer is no -- unless you want to run it under an OS running inside an x86 emulator!
WINE no, but WINE+Bochs? (Score:4)
Of course at this point I'm thinking of the old saying about thing being easy to those who don't actually have to do it...
BRTB
Wine over VPC (Score:2)
You can't run i386 code on a PPC using only Wine (as stated above)
You can already run Connectix VPC on a PPC to emulate an i386 machine, and it works pretty impressively, imo.
The disadvantage of this (and bochs) is that it requires a copy (legal or otherwise, of course) of a windows operating system. And windows backdoors, etc, will still be present. Which is why running Wine OVER VPC might be a good idea... I thought I saw linux VPC the other day, although perhaps I was hallucinating. This would be a totally free legal solution... I only worry about the speed hits... I'd guess not too bad, though.
Answering two questions (Score:1)
Wine on OSX powerpc -- nope, it's a powerpc. But winelib yes -- there has been lots of talk and no action from reading the Wine lists, but it can and probably will happen. It might have to wait for the OSX (darwin) development platform to get a little more friendly (e.g. some important libraries are in different places or nonexistant in the public beta's developer CD). I'm sure help would be welcome if you want to try -- there are already OSX Xservers, so there a major stumbling block falls (though a native version would be nice and probably run faster, not to mention being more useful for developers porting over apps for users, not developers, to use).
Re:processor compatibility (Score:1)
Re:Answering two questions (Score:2)
I'm sure... (Score:1)
- A.P.
--
* CmdrTaco is an idiot.
Re:Ummm... why? (Score:1)
-----
# cd /
Ummm... why? (Score:1)
* They're available now and VPC has 4.0 maturity
* They emulate an entire Win-32 system, not just bits and pieces. More overhead, but I'd gather less compatibility problmes.
* Relatively cheap.
Patience grasshopper. Who knows how well VirtualPC will run under MacOS X if it's made into a cocoa app?
----
Virtual PC (Score:1)
Re:Ummm... why? (Score:2)
"Relatively cheap"---relatively cheap compared to the cost of another computer, not to WINE. WINE doesn't factor into my cost comparissons as its not yet available for MacOS X or, to my knowledge, LinuxPPC. Of course when it becomes available and feature-equal to VPC it becomes the better option.
----