The backing of Adobe, an industry giant, gave me what I later discovered
was a false sense
of security. I thought that the Flex framework would not get lost in a
back alley like so many
open source projects. We invested heavily in Flex and were
disillusioned a couple of years later when Linux support for Flash was
ended. (Linux support is vital for us for reasons outside this
First time accepted submitter waslap writes "I have a leading role at a small software development company. I am
responsible for giving guidance and making decisions on tool usage
I find the task of choosing frameworks to use within our
team, and specifically UI frameworks, exceedingly difficult. A couple of
years back my investigation of RIA frameworks lead me to eventually
push for Adobe Flex [adobe.com] as the UI framework of choice for our future web
development. This was long before anyone would have guessed that Adobe would abandon the Linux version of Flash. I chose Flex
mainly for its maturity, wealth of documentation, commercial backing, and
the superior abilities of Flash, at a time when HTML 5 was still in the early stages of planning. Conversely, about 15 years ago I made a switch to Qt for desktop applications and it is still around and thriving. I am trying to understand why
it was the right choice and the others not. Perhaps Qt's design was done so well that it could not
be improved. I'm not sure whether that assessment is
cannot find a sound decision-tree based on my experiences to assist
me in making choices that have staying power. I hope the
esteemed Slashdot readers can provide helpful input
on the matter. We need a set of fail-safe axioms"
Read on for more context.
I had evaluated Adobe Flex alongside
OpenLaszlo, which at the time had the ability to use a DHTML back-end
instead of Flash with the flick of a switch. In retrospect, this
alone apparently made it a better choice in the long run regardless of
its flaky state when I first looked at it.
A similar scenario arose with
CodeIgniter, which we chose for getting away from classical spaghetti
PHP. CodeIgniter was recently dropped after we've invested a
Tesla Model X worth of money into using it. (EllisLab Seeking New Owner for CodeIgniter.)
I am standing at a cross-roads once again as people are pushing Laravel [laravel.com] for PHP, and giving other suggestions. I am scratching my (sore)
head and wondering how to prevent eventual failures in the future. It seems
there is no way to predict whether a tool will survive.
Even in retrospect, when I consider my
decision-making processes, everything was reasonable at the time
I made the choices, yet some turned out to be wrong.